Kayla Cross vs Fiona Crawley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Examining second serve performance, Cross has excelled by winning 39.96% of points on their second serve over the recent six months. In comparison, Crawley has managed a 33.88% success rate on their second serve. Statistics indicate a significant correlation between such metrics and the accuracy of match predictions.

When it comes to return games, Crawley displays a better performance in recent matches, claiming 52.73% of points on their opponent's second serves. Cross, however, has secured 48.09% in the same category. The figures for first serve returns are close, with Crawley achieving 35.48% and Cross attaining 32.39%, which is crucial in determining the favorite in head-to-head matchups.

Analyzing under pressure scenarios, Cross has been slightly more effective, saving 47.7% of breakpoints, while Crawley saved 46.81%. This information is valuable for those considering in-game betting predictions. In broader performance overviews, dating back a year, Crawley has won 59.09% of their matches, while Cross leads with a 64.56% win rate, shaping the overall prediction outlook for this match.

Surface preferences show Crawley's top skill set is on Hard courts, winning 73% of matches, whereas they struggle on Clay, with a 0% win rate. Cross similarly performs best on Hard courts, securing 63% of victories, and has their lowest percentage on indoor Hard, winning 53%.

The level of competition highlights that Crawley and Cross both predominantly compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K. Here, Crawley has a 47.06% win rate, in contrast to Cross's 64.56%, indicating a higher probability of success for Cross when tournaments have elevated stakes.

Considering opponent quality, over the past year, Crawley has faced competitors with an average ranking of 484.09, whereas Cross has competed against players ranking at an average of 470.23. In deciding sets over the same period, Cross prevails with a 65% win rate, eclipsing Crawley's 56% success, thus hinting at Cross's resilience in tightly contested situations.

For break point conversion, Crawley has been more effective, converting 46.43% of opportunities, compared to Cross's 41.36%. This detail serves as a critical indicator for live betting strategies when break points come into play.

Overall, based on these comprehensive statistics, Cross possesses a slight edge in performance across varied metrics, making them the likelier candidate to emerge victorious in the upcoming match against Crawley.